拳王

DPP’s ‘mobile-network disruption drill’ a political stunt, exposing its role as a troublemaker to cross-Straits peace: expert_我的网站

新白娘子传奇

A |

An aerial view of Taipei, Taiwan Province. Photo: VCG
At 2:30 pm on Thursday, Taipei resident Michael Chou received a mobile alert, stating that due to "simulated air attack on communications infrastructure," mobile network access would be affected.
It turned out to be a mobile internet disruption drill in the northern part of the Taiwan island. As part of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities' "urban resilience drill," the exercise was designed to simulate scenarios of limited communication resources amid major disasters or wartime conditions and verify public‑service backup capabilities, according to Taiwan-based media.
Yet in the view of observers, this performative farce not only disrupts residents' daily lives, but also acts as a tool for DPP authorities to hype up crises and amplify cross‑Straits confrontation. It essentially serves their scheme of "seeking independence by force" and narrow‑minded electoral interests.
As reported by udn.com, the exercise ran from 2:30 pm to 3 pm. When the alert was triggered, local police diverted pedestrians and vehicles to the roadside and urged the public to take shelter indoors. With mobile network speeds throttled, most people at the site lost mobile internet access; many waited out the drill indoors with available Wi‑fi and passed the time by chatting or reading.
Chou told the Global Times that 4G and 5G connections were heavily throttled during the drill, though Wi‑Fi and text messaging still worked. Even so, the exercise has created real‑world inconveniences, disrupting takeout delivery, transport‑related ticketing and outdoor emergency rescue services.
Local legislator Ko Ju-chun from the Chinese Kuomintang party was also among those opposing the drill. He accused the DPP for abusing emergency alerts which only exposed the public to inconvenience. He noted that a genuine network‑resilience drill should focus on "how the public obtain information after networks go down," yet local people still had no clear idea how to respond in such circumstances, per Taiwan-based media.
"The so‑called mobile internet disruption drill has very limited practical combat value. And if a military conflict breaks out across the Taiwan Straits, the real‑world scenario would be far more complex than the DPP authorities have envisioned, with much higher costs to bear," Zhang Wensheng, a deputy dean and a professor at the Taiwan Research Institute at Xiamen University, told the Global Times.
"The DPP authorities want the drill to stoke tensions, drumming up public backing for its combative defense policies and higher military budgets. Yet it fears over‑hyping the specter of war would disrupt daily life and erode its popular support, hence this superficial, showpiece drill," said the expert.
According to Zhang, the DPP authorities also intend to test Taiwan residents' tolerance threshold. It seeks to observe whether the public will passively acquiesce or push back strongly, so as to assess the mobilization effect of its narratives of "resisting mainland to protect Taiwan" and "rejecting reunification by force."
Prior to the mobile internet disruption drill in northern parts of Taiwan island, seven counties and cities in the central Taiwan region held the same drill on Monday afternoon.
Many residents have questioned why the southern region was exempt. DPP officials claimed southern Taiwan had suffered real‑life communication outages in past years and that a drill in the southern part of the island scheduled to take place at 10 am, when the Stock Exchange of Taiwan region is open, could disrupt real-time stock transactions.
"This drill is utterly absurd," Chou said, "The DPP probably figures that if anything goes wrong in central and northern Taiwan, it does not matter, local mayors would take the blame."
Echoing Chou, Zhang said that the DPP authorities do not want drill‑related disruptions to harm their core support base in southern Taiwan, particularly Tainan and Kaohsiung. By contrast, jurisdictions across central and northern Taiwan include many areas ruled by the KMT, which are being used as test subjects for the exercise.
By striking a posture of "combat readiness," hyping up cross‑Straits confrontation and ramping up ideological mobilization, the DPP aims to serve its interests in the year‑end local elections, he added.
"However, voters always pay more attention to livelihoods, the economy and governance performance in local election. If DPP's political manipulation go too far, it will backfire," Zhang said. "The overwhelming majority of Taiwan compatriots refuse to become cannon‑fodder for secessionists."
The DPP authorities do not hesitate to use the well‑being of Taiwan residents and cross‑Straits peace and stability as bargaining chips for their own political interests, fully laying bare its true colors as a troublemaker, the expert warned.
。 7月17日，上海黄浦江畔，2026世界人工智能大会暨人工智能全球治理高级别会议开幕。1100余家企业集中参展亮相，超300款产品全球首发，规模与首发数量均创下历届之最。　　同一天，纽约华尔街投资者却慌了。以科技股为主的纳斯达克100指数收盘下跌1.5%，创近一个月最差周度表现。费城半导体指数较6月高点回撤20.2%，进入技术性熊市。　　上海一场会，美股跌了。华尔街的分析师们争论不休，但有一个名字被反复提及——Kimi K3。　　它是月之暗面于大会开幕前夕发布的新一代开源模型，参数规模2.8万亿，当前全球参数体量最大。在编程能力盲测榜单上，它以1679分登顶。

B | 　　在中国，这是一次技术突破，引爆了用户需求，火到算力紧缺，7月19日晚间月之暗面宣布暂停C端新用户订阅。　　而在美国，它却成了恐慌源头。华尔街称之为“Kimi时刻”，对应去年的“DeepSeek时刻”。

C | 两次冲击，同一个逻辑：当中国开源模型以极低成本逼近甚至超越美国旗舰产品时，过去支撑华尔街万亿美元估值的算力竞赛逻辑，正在被重估。

D | 　　慌的不止华尔街。7月15日，美联储主席凯文·沃什上任后首次赴国会作证，矛头直指中国AI。他把中美AI竞争描述为“代理人战争”，将中国定义为“步步紧逼的竞争者”。　　从资本市场波动，到政府官员喊话，美国坐不住了。　　剥开表象，美国这种恐慌，或源于三重失控。　　首当其冲的，是技术霸权的松动。　　目前，中国手握全球60%的AI专利。工业和信息化部最新数据显示，今年上半年，规模以上制造业企业AI技术应用普及率超30%，开源大模型全球累计下载量突破100亿次。　　专利数量、产业渗透、用户覆盖，多个指标同步验证，说明这场赶超早已走出实验室层面。正因如此，Siebert Financial首席投资官马克·马莱克直言，“无论中美前沿AI之间曾存在多大差距，现在都已大幅缩小。

E | ” 　　技术差距缩小，改变的是市场逻辑。美国企业在AI基础设施上砸了数万亿美元，如果中国模型提供可行的替代方案，这些投资还值多少？　　高盛合伙人、股票业务负责人Rich Privorotsky警告，算力扩张时代或已走到尽头。　　再深一层看，是市场垄断的瓦解。　　长期以来，美国通过限制GPU出口、封闭模型、限制访问等单边主义措施，试图固化垄断，使发展中国家沦为“黑箱AI”的被动消费者。

F | 　　而中国模型不仅技术过硬，更极具性价比，提供了优选项。以Kimi K3为例，在多项公开编程及智能体基准测试中，它超越OpenAI和Anthropic旗舰产品，成本却较同类美国顶级模型低约40%。　　市场用脚投票。在主流模型聚合平台OpenRouter上，中国大模型周调用量已连续十一周超过美国并稳居全球首位。工业和信息化部数据显示，受全球AI需求推动，上半年，以人民币计价的集成电路、电子元件等产品出口额同比分别增长88.7%、62.6%。

G | 　　更深层次的恐慌，是规则制定权的旁落。　　面对技术变革的十字路口，中美给出的治理方案截然不同。　　美国将AI技术泛化为地缘博弈工具，甚至不惜将前沿模型卷入地缘冲突的军事化应用。　　中国则走了另一条路。从提出《全球人工智能治理倡议》到推出《人工智能全球治理行动计划》，从发起“人工智能+”国际合作倡议到实施《人工智能能力建设普惠计划》以及倡议成立世界人工智能合作组织，中国以开放姿态推动全球AI走向合作共享。　　正如国家发展改革委创新驱动发展中心主任霍福鹏在接受三里河采访时表示，中国始终是强化全球人工智能治理合作的坚定支持者。　　中国在搭桥，美国在拆台；中国强调以人为本，美国高喊利益优先；中国开放共享，美国升级封锁；中国提供机遇清单，美国输出技术霸权。　　美国越焦虑，越说明中国这条路走对了。就连美国企业都在用脚投票。相关研究显示，80%的美国AI初创公司都在用中国的开源模型做推理和微调。　　事实证明，在这场关乎人类未来的技术演进中，抱守小院高墙没有出路，唯有全球加强合作、共享普惠，才能真正赢得下一个时代。